Who writes our guides, and how
Realestate Lens is a pre-launch property-research website and planned buyer-assistance app built by Promethic Labs in Sydney, Australia. This page separates the founder's product-editorial role from the qualified review required for high-stakes legal, tax and financial claims.
Who’s behind it
Zeerak
Founder & Product Lead
Zeerak is the founder, product lead and developer of Realestate Lens. He is responsible for the website's product direction and editorial review of product copy. This role is not presented as a legal, conveyancing, tax or financial qualification; high-stakes content requires an article-specific qualified reviewer to be named before professional review is claimed.
Zeerak is the named owner of product copy and general website editorial review. We do not claim that an unnamed team of practising professionals has reviewed the library. A high-stakes article may claim qualified review only when the reviewer is named on that article with a relevant credential and review date.
How we create our content
We are upfront about our process, including where we use AI. This is general educational information, not personal financial, legal, or tax advice.
Primary-source requirement
Before approval, a factual legal, tax, scheme or statistical claim should link to the government document, legislation or dataset that directly supports it. A generic source list is not enough.
AI-assisted drafting, named editorial owner
AI may assist drafting and structure. The founder is the named editorial owner for product copy, but that review is not a legal, tax or financial professional endorsement.
Qualified-review gate for high-stakes work
A legal, conveyancing, tax or financial article must identify its article-specific qualified reviewer and review date before professional review is claimed. If no reviewer is named, readers should not infer one.
Status and correction discipline
Draft policy, enacted law, administrative guidance, official projections and our own interpretation must be labelled separately. Material corrections should be dated and explain what changed.
What we research against
Depending on the claim, an article should use the relevant primary authority from sources such as:
Accuracy, AI use, and limits
AI disclosure. We use AI tools to assist with drafting and structuring articles. AI output is not evidence. A named human editorial owner must check the final page and its cited sources before approval.
General information only. Our guides, glossary, and articles are educational. They do not constitute financial, legal, or tax advice, and they are not a substitute for advice from a qualified Australian solicitor, licensed conveyancer, registered tax agent, or financial adviser who can assess your specific circumstances.
Corrections. If you spot something that looks out of date or incorrect, email support@realestatelens.com.au. We will assess the report and, where a material error is confirmed, correct it with a dated note.
This editorial-standards page was last updated on . That is not a library-wide legal-review date and does not show that an individual article received qualified review.